Selection Sunday is only a month away, and only a few teams
from the college basketball landscape have locked in their bids for the NCAA
Tournament while others are fighting for their lives to get into the
tournament.
The Big Ten Conference is one of the most competitive
leagues from top to bottom and are projected to land as many as eight teams in
the field, maybe even nine. However, there is certainly a lot of basketball
left in the regular season for teams to make a run and cover lost ground. There
is also enough basketball left for teams to have an utter catastrophic collapse
at the end of the regular season.
Once the regular season is over, the conference tournaments
begin, and bid stealers lurk in the shadows and the most unlikely upsets occur.
You can just feel the anxiety and nervousness amongst the
fan bases.
That's why I've decided to reach out to bracketology expert
Jason R. of JBR Bracketology. Jason explains the hard work that goes into
creating a bracket, and the specific data he analyzes when selecting teams.
Jason also answers my questions about what Rutgers needs to do to ensure a bid
into the NCAA Tournament and what possible seed they can achieve. I also asked
a few questions about other teams in the Big Ten and where do they project to land
in the field, as well as some of the perceived bubble teams in the Big Ten.
Please follow and support JBR Bracketology on Twitter @
JBRBracketology. Jason updates his brackets every few days during the week.
Rutgers Hoops Insider (RHI): Jason,
thanks for taking some time out of your day today to do a Q&A with me.
You’re a 2015 Maryland graduate and have been following college basketball for
as long as you can remember. You told me Maryland’s national championship in
2002 fueled your passion for college hoops at a very young age. Over the last
four years, you’ve taken up an interest in bracketology and call it JBR
Bracketology. So, I think it would be appropriate as my first question to ask
why did you take up an interest in doing your own bracketology?
Jason R. (JBR): Thanks for having me! I
first started bracketology during the 2020 season. Maryland was a top 10 team
most of the season and I just kept feeling like the Terps were being
disrespected by bracketologists, as the Big Ten was the #1 conference that
season per KenPom. So I was curious to see what they were seeing, what was
holding the Terps back.
RHI: In last year’s NCAA
Tournament, you selected 67 out of 68 teams correctly, and at least had 66 out
of 68 teams seeded within +/-1 seed line for a total score of 357. Is there a
magic formula you use when selecting teams? What rankings and metrics do you
pay most attention to when it comes to selecting teams? What truly goes into
building a bracket?
JBR: I had two real misses last
year – one was including Texas A&M over Notre Dame, and the other was
seeding Colgate as a 16 when the committee had them as a 14 seed. The Texas
A&M snub served as a reminder how little the committee takes the final two
days of conference tournaments into account. Colgate was a silly one to get
wrong, but have tweaked my formula to better account for the mid to low major
AQs and what the committee is looking for. I am proud of the fact that every
single at large team I had seeded exactly correct or one seed line off. Following
Selection Sunday, I spent several hours combing through the data to make
changes for this year to be as accurate as I can be when matching what the
committee is looking for!
In terms of a secret formula, I have always been very
analytical. I love my spreadsheets, I love math, I love using numbers. In other
words – yes, I do use a secret formula. When I first started back in 2020, I
was obviously new and had a tough time figuring out how to adjust the weights
for quad records, the NET, the resume metrics, the predictive metrics etc. to
best match the committee. It’s a growing process and I make changes all the
time. Most of them now are pretty minor, but being adaptable is key. The
categories I look at are weighted record (different weights for wins by Quad),
weighed win percentage, Quad 1A wins, wins over projected 1 or 2 seeds, NET,
KPI, SOR, KenPom, Sagarin, BPI and Non-Conference SOS. They are all weighted
differently, but at the end of the day, the most important thing is always
going to be quality wins.
RHI: I’ve noticed you have had
many constructive debates and conversations with many bracketologists, and
sometimes you’ve been critical of some bracketologists. What do you think
separates yourself from some of the other bracketologists, and why do you think
your bracket this year will be more accurate than most other bracketologists?
JBR: Haha, yes, I do love some
occasional friendly banter. One of the things I think I excel at in this field
is eliminating bias. Because my seeding is almost entirely formulaic, it
reduces the chances that I let my own personal bias influence where a team is
seeded. Now obviously, my formula is dictated by my own mathematical inputs and
various weights I put on each category, but me disliking Duke isn’t going to
change where my formula has them. As an example, I am pretty sure my formula
has been lower on Maryland than Bracket Matrix/ consensus for weeks now. But
that’s ok. I’m not necessarily trying to make friends here, just trying to
display what I honestly think committee would do.
RHI: I wanted to shift gears
and turn our attention to the Rutgers Scarlet Knights and the Big Ten
Conference. I’m going to get straight to the point and ask you, how many teams
from the Big Ten are going to make the tournament this year? Which teams?
JBR: I will say Big Ten gets 8
bids. Northwestern all but secured their spot with a massive win over Purdue. I
could see Wisconsin or Michigan earning the league's 9th bid, but I think the
chances of that are low with each of them dropping key games this weekend.
RHI: You have the Purdue
Boilermakers as the number 1 overall seed for the NCAA Tournament in your
latest projections. Alabama has been playing incredible basketball all year, do
you think the Crimson Tide could dethrone the Boilermakers? If not Alabama, is
there anyone else that can grab the number 1 spot?
JBR: Well, I think that will be
switched already with Purdue falling to Northwestern as I type this. Alabama
will move to #1, while Purdue will drop to #2. In terms of other teams capable
of earning the #1 overall seed, I would say the winner of the Big 12 – Kansas
or Texas, just because they will have an insane number of Quad 1 (and Quad 1A)
wins.
RHI: Rutgers (21 in NET) is
coming off a very difficult week. They had a big win over Michigan State at The
Garden just about over a week ago, but they lost their key defensive starter
Mawot Mag to an ACL tear in the process. Then Rutgers followed the Michigan
State victory with two road losses to two very good teams in Indiana (Q1) and
Illinois (Q1). Where do you have Rutgers in the field in your next update?
JBR: My next update will come
out Monday afternoon. There were a lot of teams around Rutgers that lost this
weekend, but I would expect Rutgers to come in as a low end 7 seed, if not the
top 8 seed. The loss of Mawot Mag hurts, and we have now seen Rutgers go 0-2
without him, albeit against high level competition on the road.
RHI: Rutgers only has six games
left in the regular season. In your opinion, what does Rutgers have to do to
get back on the 5/6-seed line? At a minimum, what does Rutgers have to do to
earn a single digit seed in the tournament?
JBR: To earn a single digit
seed, I think Rutgers just needs to finish 3-3. To get back to the 5/6 line
where they were before the Indiana & Illinois losses, they probably need to
go 5-1. Currently, just one of their final 6 games are Quad 1 (2/26 @ Penn
State). If Rutgers finishes 4-2, they probably end up with a 7 seed. Of course,
none of this happens in a vacuum. What the other teams around them do matters
as well.
RHI: Wisconsin (73 in NET) and
Penn State (62 in NET) are two teams that started off the season in great
shape. Now, both teams are on the verge of collapse and are desperate to save
their seasons. You had Wisconsin as one of your “First Four Out”, where are the
Badgers now after their epic collapse against Nebraska on Saturday? Is Penn
State still in the bubble conversation after losing their 4th in
a row? What do both teams have to do to get back in the conversation?
JBR: As I stated previously, my
next update will come out Monday afternoon. The bubble had a *rough* Saturday,
my guess is Wisconsin roughly stays in the same spot, as a member of the first
four out, but maybe a couple spots closer to the next four out. Penn State following
their loss to Maryland is going to have a really tough time making the
tournament at this point. Good news is Penn State still has five Quad 1 games
remaining. Win at least 3 of those, and they will at least be close. Win four
and they’re probably a lock to earn an at large bid. But that is much easier
said than done.
RHI: Maryland has been surging
lately but they have been gifted a lighter conference schedule than most other
Big Ten teams. By season’s end they will have played the Big Ten’s bottom tier
teams twice (Nebraska, Minnesota, Ohio State, and Wisconsin). Maryland is 3-8
against Q1 opponents and they have only one Big Ten road win all season, which
was against Minnesota, yet the Terps have a NET Ranking of 28. You currently
have Maryland in the field as a 9-seed. The Terps close out the season against
Purdue (home), Nebraska (away), Minnesota (home), Northwestern (home), Ohio
State (away), and Penn State (away). What does Maryland have to do down the
stretch to improve its seed? What is the worst case for scenario?
JBR: Terps likely jump to an 8
seed with their win over Penn State. But Maryland is still lacking an elite
win. They have three Quad 1 wins, which is pretty good, but none of them are
Quad 1A. To get to the 5 or 6 line, Maryland will either need to knock off
Purdue or win at least 2 of their remaining road games - @ Nebraska, @ Ohio
State, @ Penn State. Most likely scenario for Maryland I think is a 7 or 8
seed. Worst case scenario would be dropping down to bubble/ last four in.
RHI: Michigan has been a
strange team no one’s been able to figure out. They have a couple head
scratching losses but they also have some very impressive wins. Michigan is
currently 14-11 overall, and 8-6 in the Big Ten with a NET Ranking of 64. Is
Michigan in the bubble conversation? Should we dismiss Michigan from any
tournament chatter? What do you think Michigan has to do to get into the
tournament?
JBR: I wouldn’t dismiss
Michigan, they do still have talent and are always a tough out. But that loss
to Indiana on Saturday really hurt their at large chances. Currently 14-11, the
Wolverines likely need to finish 5-1 to be a lock. 4-2 would get them close.
3-3 or worse, and Michigan will need to win Big Ten Tournament to earn a bid.
RHI: Give us your final
prediction on Rutgers in their next six games, and where do you think they will
land in the field on Selection Sunday.
JBR: I will say Rutgers
finished 21-10 (13-7) and earns a 6 seed in the NCAA Tournament.
Feel free to follow me on Twitter - @JBRBracketology! Love
talking college basketball with fellow Big Ten fans.
RHI: Jason, thanks again. It
was a great conversation and hopefully we can do it again soon.